Have you been spending too much time on Capterra and G2 figuring out the Loomly alternatives? Chances are you're not enjoying your experience with Loomly, or maybe you want to explore better options that meet your business needs. Why you should consider a Loomly...
Tools similar to Buffer:
11 Buffer Alternatives of 2025: Tried, Tested & Reviewed
Buffer is a solid social media management platform that caters to diverse needs. Well-known for its entry-level affordability and long time presence on the market, it helps users to manage multiple social media accounts efficiently, but it also has its shortcomings compared to the multitude of Buffer alternatives available.
This article will go through the top alternatives to Buffer in 2025 — I went through all of them, so you don’t have to. I’ll show you what each tool is best suited for, its disadvantages, and stack it up against Buffer to see which is the better fit for you.
Why you should consider a Buffer alternative
Buffer calendar | Buffer collaboration | Buffer approval | Buffer takeaway
Buffer is an all-in-one social media management solution for small and medium-sized businesses. The platform handles social media scheduling, analytics, and engagement tools through an easy-to-grasp interface.
Buffer supports Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Twitter, YouTube, TikTok, Threads, Bluesky, Pinterest, Google Business Profile (formerly known as Google My Business), Mastodon, and Shopify.
Aside from its social media management features, you can also use Buffer to quickly set up landing pages and ease the content creation process via its AI-powered assistant — ideal for creating basic sales funnels and enhancing your marketing strategy.
Now that we’ve covered the basics, let’s dive a little deeper into Buffer’s social media scheduling tool and collaboration features — the cornerstones to managing your social accounts.
Calendar
You’ll find Buffer’s content calendar in the Publishing dashboard. This functionality allows you to view your posting schedule and plan social posts across various platforms within a couple of clicks.
Buffer’s content calendar
Most notably, Buffer allows you to create posts directly within the calendar, sparing you from going back and forth between multiple tabs. You can also upload media files through the platform’s integrations with Canva, Dropbox, Google Drive, Unsplash, Giphy, and more.
The calendar view allows you to sift through planned posts via the following filters: Drafts, scheduled posts, sent posts, pending approval, and all posts. You can view planned content weekly or monthly and rearrange posts by dragging and dropping them across the calendar.
Buffer calendar takeaway: The interface is intuitive, but I find it rather bleak — a splash of color would make the platform significantly more pleasant to look at. The calendar also lacks the ability to leave notes.
Collaboration
Buffer’s team collaboration tools are highly straightforward. You can invite team members to your workspace via email and assign them specific social media channels. You can also set various permission levels, including full posting access, approval required, and administrator access.
Note: You can add unlimited team members with Buffer’s Team plan, starting at $10/channel/month (paid annually).
There’s also the Ideas functionality, where social media teams can quickly leave notes, create, collaborate, and save concepts for upcoming posts. The Free plan supports up to 100 ideas, while paid plans offer unlimited ideas.
Buffer collaboration takeaway: Buffer’s collaboration tools now support unlimited team members, internal post comments, and easy content planning with the Ideas feature.
Approvals
Approvals in Buffer are also a walk in the park. You can select which members can approve posts and which ones need to request approvals before publishing. Users with administrator or full posting access can view to-be-approved posts under the Awaiting approvals tab.
From there, users can either delete, edit, approve, or send the content back to the original creator. Again, this functionality is only available in the Team and Agency plans.
Overall, I noticed that Buffer’s collaboration and approval tools are relatively shallow. For instance, if you handle approvals and wish to send a post back to the original creator for further editing, you can’t leave feedback. It also lacks the option to invite clients to your workspace.
Buffer approvals takeaway: You’ll need to rely on external tools to communicate effectively, which can leave you prone to communication errors and lost information.
Final Buffer takeaway
When it comes to limitations, some users report occasional performance issues and crashes. Others say that the platform has limited analytics capabilities. Its social media analytics tool can only generate reports for Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Twitter, and Shopify.
A major drawback is also the platform’s pricing structure. Most pricing plans allow users to select the number of social media channels they need, with costs adjusted accordingly — meaning you’ll pay more for multiple channels. The free plan supports up to three channels, while paid packages start at $5/month per channel for one user (when paid annually). All paid plans offer a 14-day free trial.
Here’s why social media managers should consider a Buffer alternative in 2025
- Buffer’s per-social channel pricing structure can make the platform pricey for those who manage multiple social accounts. The platform’s Free and Essentials plans are only available to individual users.
- Although Buffer offers a broad feature set, most functionalities are rather limited (lacks calendar notes, comments in context, ideal posting time suggestions only available for Instagram, etc.).
- The platform requires external tools for effective communication.
Buffer alternative #1: Planable. The best alternative for collaboration & approval.
Planable is a content collaboration and social media management tool for agencies, brands and creators that allows you to effectively collaborate and create any type of written content you want — be it social media posts, content briefs, emails, newsletters, or blogs.
The platform does this through its extensive team collaboration options. You can leave comments next to each draft, mention team members, add internal notes, assign custom users roles and permissions, and much more.
Planable shines through its in-depth approval workflows. You can choose between multiple approval options: none, optional, required, and multi-level.
As for social media management, the platform includes a highly visual social media calendar where you can leave notes and approve content directly. The calendar also allows you to organize content through a drag-and-drop interface and color-coded labels.
Planable’s content calendar
Planable also comes with an Analytics add-on, which allows you to easily follow content performance and generate reports for your clients and stakeholders. Other notable features include version control, various views (feed, calendar, grid), media libraries, and more.
Drawbacks: Planable doesn’t include social listening or monitoring.
Supported platforms: Facebook, Instagram, Threads, LinkedIn, Pinterest, Twitter, TikTok, YouTube, Google Business Profile.
Pricing: You can schedule up to 50 posts for free. Paid plans start at $33/workspace. Pricing depends on the number of desired workspaces.
Planable vs Buffer
Calendar
Both tools have rather similar UIs in terms of ease of use. They offer a drag-and-drop interface and give you quick access to all necessary calendar features, like filtering options and the ability to view planned content weekly or monthly.
However, I found that Planable brings more quality-of-life improvements. For one, its social media calendar is more aesthetic — it’s colorful and generally has more going on to it without making it feel cluttered. You’ll find all your social accounts above the calendar. Clicking the icons corresponding to your social media accounts will either hide or reveal the content specific to each channel.
Then there are the features. Unlike Buffer, Planable’s content calendar allows you to leave notes and organize posts via color-coded labels. These labels are excellent for categorizing posts by topic or team. You also have more filtering options, like approval status, post type, feedback (comments, internal notes, resolved comments), and more.
Collaboration
Since Planable is a content collaboration solution, the platform outdoes Buffer in this department. You can easily mention team members, leave comments next to each upcoming post, and collaborate on content in real time.
Facebook feed view in Planable with collaboration next to the post
The platform also allows you to leave internal notes (comments which cannot be seen by your clients) — ideal for discussing posts behind the scenes. Speaking of clients, you can invite them to your workspace. From there, they can leave feedback, approve content, and more.
Approvals
Approvals are one of Planable’s strong suits. You can streamline approval processes by selecting which type of approval workflow suits you the best. No approvals are excellent if you’re a one-man army — it spares you the trouble of clicking a few extra buttons before publishing content.
Planable’s multiple approval workflow settings
Meanwhile, you can use multi-level approvals to ensure that you deliver highly polished content to your clients. For instance, a post first needs to get approved by the team leader, then by the marketing manager, while your client does the final sign-off.
You can approve content directly within the calendar. If you’re not happy with a post, simply leave feedback via comments and notify the original creator — Buffer lacks this functionality.
You can also keep everything organized by grouping your work into campaigns — each with its own calendar, media library, analytics, brief space, and strategy hub.
Planable’s campaign dashboard with multiple social media campaigns
Pricing
All pricing options are calculated based on the pricing of the annual subscription.
$49/month for:
- 10 social media pages
- approval workflow on 3 different levels
- 50GB media library
- tagging team members in comments for each post
- 10 labels/ tags for posts
- no social inbox & monitoring
$100/month for:
- 10 channels
- approval workflow tools
- build a simple landing page
- 250 tags
- Downloadable branded reports with cover page
$33/month per workspace for:
- unlimited users
- 4 social media pages
- calendar & feed view
- approval workflow on 2 different levels
- 10GB content library
- 5 labels/tags for posts
- analytics add–on available
$5/month per channel for:
- one user
- hashtag manager
- no approval workflow
- 250 tags
- analytics included
$49/month for:
- 10 social media pages
- approval workflow on 3 different levels
- 50GB media library
- tagging team members in comments for each post
- 10 labels/ tags for posts
- no social inbox & monitoring
(3 users & 10 social media accounts)
$100/month for:
- 10 channels
- approval workflow tools
- build a simple landing page
- 250 tags
- Downloadable branded reports with cover page
$33/month per workspace for:
- unlimited users
- 4 social media pages
- calendar & feed view
- approval workflow on 2 different levels
- 10GB content library
- 5 labels/tags for posts
- analytics add–on available
$5/month per channel for:
- one user
- hashtag manager
- no approval workflow
- 250 tags
- analytics included
Planable vs. Buffer final takeaway: the best Buffer Alternative
Planable is the best Buffer alternative for content collaboration and approval. The platform offers extensive approval options, while the ability to leave feedback, store files in the media library, and collaborate on posts in real time can do wonders for your content creation process.
In other words, it fills in most of Buffer’s gaps. You can schedule up to 50 posts for free, so it’s definitely worth a shot!
Buffer alternative #2: Hootsuite. The alternative for large companies.
Hootsuite is an all-in-one social media marketing platform designed to help businesses take their social media game to the next level. Some of its key features include bulk scheduling, content curation, campaign management, advanced analytics, social listening, and social media advertising.
Hootsuite is best suited for large businesses due to its advanced team management capabilities. You can set up an Organization (a group of teams), which gives you easy access to each specific team. From there, you can assign tasks and route messages to a specific team or team member. The platform also covers employee productivity reports and advocacy tools.
Drawbacks: The platform is pricey. Users report a clunky UI and a steep learning curve for newcomers.
Supported platforms: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Twitter, Threads, YouTube, TikTok, and Pinterest.
Pricing: Pricing starts at $99/user/month (annually, one user and 10 social accounts included) with a 30-day free trial available. If Hootsuite didn’t quite fit the bill, consider going thorough this list of Hootsuite alternatives for a better match.
Hootsuite vs Buffer
- Features: Hootsuite is significantly more in-depth. The platform includes social media advertising, bulk scheduling, team productivity reports, content suggestions, social listening tools, and much more — something which Buffer lacks.
- Analytics: Hootsuite offers more advanced analytics capabilities. Unlike Buffer, Hootsuite covers TikTok analytics, competitive benchmarking (automatically analyzes your competitors’ performance and compares it to your content strategy), and social ROI analysis.
- Ease of use: Due to its simplicity, Buffer is significantly easier to use. Hootsuite is complex and has a steep learning curve.
- Pricing: In the Buffer vs Hootsuite debate, pricing is another major factor. With prices starting at $99/month (annually), Hootsuite is considerably more expensive. Buffer offers a free plan, while paid packages start at $5/channel/month (annually).
Pricing
All pricing options are calculated based on the pricing of the annual subscription.
$99/month
- 1 user
- unlimited scheduled posts
- recommended publishing time
- competitive benchmarketing tool
- social inbox
$60/month ($5 per social media account):
- 1 user
- unlimited scheduled posts per channel
- scheduling posts on predefined time slots
- calendar view
- save draft posts
- reporting
- approval workflows restricted to more expensive plans
$99/month
- 1 user
- unlimited scheduled posts
- recommended publishing time
- competitive benchmarketing tool
- social inbox
$60/month ($5 per social media account):
- 1 user
- unlimited scheduled posts per channel
- scheduling posts on predefined time slots
- calendar view
- save draft posts
- reporting
- approval workflows restricted to more expensive plans
Takeaway: Hootsuite is a good alternative to Buffer for large organizations. Its team management, employee advocacy tools, and in-depth reports, along with its content curation, social listening, and social advertising tools, are perfect for managing a company’s social media presence at scale.
Buffer alternative #3: Sprout Social. An alternative for social customer relationship management.
Sprout Social is another in-depth all-in-one social media management software solution. The platform covers content scheduling, social media engagement, advertising tools, and more.
One of Sprout Social’s key features is its built-in social media Customer Relationship Management (CRM) solution — you can easily monitor previous conversations, as well as store and access all the customer information necessary to address support issues and turn leads into loyal customers.
You can leave notes next to each customer profile, like the best time to contact a specific customer or additional contact info. Your team can also communicate with leads directly within the dashboard.
Drawbacks: Users report a steep learning curve and occasional bugs (scheduled content failing to post, linked profiles disconnecting, etc.). Additionally, Sprout Social is considered premium-priced.
Supported platforms: Instagram, Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), TikTok, LinkedIn, Pinterest, YouTube, Threads.
Pricing: Plans start at $199 per user per month for the Standard plan (billed anually), which includes 5 social profiles. The Professional plan is priced at $299 per user per month and offers unlimited social profiles. A 30-day free trial is available.
Sprout Social vs Buffer
- Features: Sprout Social is more comprehensive — it includes a social CRM, paid advertising, and review management tools.
- Analytics: Sprout Social covers TikTok analytics, unlike Buffer. Additionally, Sprout Social’s reports reveal slightly more information (competitor performance, team, and task reports). However, Sprout Social puts additional reporting capabilities behind a paywall.
- Ease of use: Sprout Social is more complex, and users mention a steep learning curve.
- Pricing: Buffer is significantly more affordable.
Pricing
All pricing options are calculated based on the pricing of the annual subscription.
$199/month
- 10 brand keywords to monitor
- up to 200,000 followers
- paid promotion for Facebook & Instagram
- social inbox
$25/month ($5 per social media account) for:
- 1 user
- unlimited scheduled posts per channel
- scheduling posts on predefined time slots
- calendar view
- save draft posts
- reporting
- approval workflows restricted to more expensive plans
$199/month
- 10 brand keywords to monitor
- up to 200,000 followers
- paid promotion for Facebook & Instagram
- social inbox
$25/month ($5 per social media account):
- 1 user
- unlimited scheduled posts per channel
- scheduling posts on predefined time slots
- calendar view
- save draft posts
- reporting
- approval workflows restricted to more expensive plans
Takeaway: Sprout Social is among the best Buffer alternatives for marketing agencies seeking to improve customer relationships. Its powerful social CRM and inbox management capabilities ensure that social media marketers maintain maximum engagement with prospects at all times.
Buffer alternative #4: Sendible. An alternative for managing multiple social media accounts.
Sendible and Buffer are rather similar. Both are straightforward social media management tools catering to small businesses. However, Sendible is the better choice for social media marketers seeking to manage multiple accounts.
Sendible’s Traction plan costs $76/month (annually) and includes up to 24 social profiles. In contrast, Buffer’s Team plan costs $10/month per social media channel when billed annually, with unlimited users. Managing 10 profiles with Buffer would total $100/month. That said, Sendible offers better value for money in this regard. Other notable features include social media monitoring, client and team collaboration, custom approval workflows, and more.
Drawbacks: Sendible does not support Pinterest. There’s no 24/7 support available in any of its pricing plans.
Supported platforms: Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, X (Twitter), LinkedIn, Google My Business, YouTube, WordPress.
Pricing: Plans start at $25/month (annually, for one user and 6 social profiles). There’s also a 14-day free trial available.
Sendible vs Buffer
- Features: Sendible includes slightly more collaboration tools (client dashboards and the ability to leave comments under tasks). However, unlike Sendible, Buffer also features an AI-powered assistant (currently in Beta).
- Analytics: Buffer is more comprehensive in analytics and reports. The platform leverages Machine Learning (for Instagram only) for suggestions like best time to post or ideal posting frequency. Custom reports are also available in Buffer’s entry-level paid plan. This option is only available in Sendible’s top-tier package.
- Ease of use: Both platforms are highly easy to use, but Buffer scores slightly higher on G2 in this department.
- Pricing: While Buffer remains competitive, Sendible offers better value for money when managing multiple channels. For example, Buffer’s Essentials plan costs $30/month (annually, calculated at $5 per channel for one user and six channels). In comparison, Sendible’s Creator plan is priced at $25/month (billed annually), covering one user and six social profiles, with no per-channel cost structure.
Pricing
All pricing options are calculated based on the pricing of the annual subscription.
$25/month for:
- 1 user
- unlimited scheduling
- Comment monitoring for Facebook pages, Instagram business profiles, and LinkedIn company pages
- priority inbox
- RSS/blog feeds
$30/month ($5 per social media account) for:
- 1 user
- unlimited scheduled posts per channel
- scheduling posts on predefined time slots
- calendar view
- save draft posts
- reporting
- approval workflows restricted to more expensive plans
$25/month for:
- 1 user
- unlimited scheduling
- Comment monitoring for Facebook pages, Instagram business profiles, and LinkedIn company pages
- priority inbox
- RSS/blog feeds
$30/month ($5 per social media account):
- 1 user
- unlimited scheduled posts per channel
- scheduling posts on predefined time slots
- calendar view
- save draft posts
- reporting
- approval workflows restricted to more expensive plans
Takeaway: Sendible is a good Buffer alternative for small businesses seeking to boost their social media presence across multiple social networks.
Buffer alternative #5: Agorapulse. An alternative for social inbox management.
Agorapulse is a social media management tool that handles social media monitoring, scheduling, reporting, and more. The platform allows you to easily schedule the same post across multiple social media platforms and optimize it for each channel before publishing.
One of Agorapulse’s key features is its inbox management system. The platform’s Inbox Assistant will automatically organize and label incoming messages based on specified criteria and assign these messages to the appropriate team member. Other notable features include team performance reports, approval workflows, and calendar notes.
Drawbacks: Lacks Pinterest support. Some essential features (like collaboration and bulk publishing) are reserved for upper-tier plans.
Supported platforms: Facebook, Instagram, X (formerly Twitter), LinkedIn, YouTube, TikTok, Google Business Profile.
Pricing: There’s a free plan available to one user, includes 3 social profiles and allows up to 10 scheduled posts. Paid plans start at $79/user/month (annually).
Agorapulse vs Buffer
- Features: Agorapulse’s features are more extensive — it covers bulk scheduling and approvals, Google My Business review management, spam management, and more.
- Analytics: Both platforms deliver in-depth information on the performance of your social media strategy (engagement, impressions, boosted post performance). However, Agorapulse also includes team performance reports. In contrast, Buffer provides Shopify analytics, unlike Agorapulse.
- Ease of use: Both platforms are easy to use. They have a roughly similar rating in this department, with Buffer winning by a small margin.
- Pricing: Buffer remains more affordable, with plans starting at $5/month per social channel (billed annually), compared to Agorapulse’s $79/user/month.
Pricing
All pricing options are calculated based on the pricing of the annual subscription.
$79/month for:
- 1 user
- unlimited posts
- content library for 10 images / 2 videos
- manage Google reviews
- social inbox
$50/month ($5 per social media account) for:
- 1 user
- unlimited scheduled posts per channel
- scheduling posts on predefined time slots
- calendar view
- save draft posts
- reporting
- approval workflows restricted to more expensive plans
$79/month for:
- 1 user
- unlimited posts
- content library for 10 images / 2 videos
- manage Google reviews
- social inbox
$50/month ($5 per social media account):
- 1 user
- unlimited scheduled posts per channel
- scheduling posts on predefined time slots
- calendar view
- save draft posts
- reporting
- approval workflows restricted to more expensive plans
Takeaway: Agorapulse is among the best Buffer alternatives in terms of inbox management. The platform’s automated Inbox Assistant, large variety of available inbox filters, and labels, allow social media marketing teams to easily organize messages and promptly respond to inquiries.
Buffer alternative #6: CoSchedule. An alternative for content planning and marketing.
CoSchedule is a straightforward marketing tool that allows you to easily plan and publish content across the most popular social media platforms through its intuitive calendar.
The platform also includes numerous work management capabilities — you can assign tasks to team members, define task priorities, set up recurring tasks, and more. Other notable features include an email subject line tester, a headline generator, color-coded calendar labels, and an AI-powered writing assistant.
Drawbacks: X (Twitter) integration is exclusive to paid plans.
Supported platforms: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Pinterest, TikTok, Threads, Twitter/X, YouTube, Google Business Profile, Mastodon, Bluesky.
Pricing: A free plan is available for one user with two social profiles. Paid plans start at $19 per user per month (billed annually) for up to three users and five social profiles.
CoSchedule vs Buffer
- Features: Buffer is better for managing social media management processes — it includes engagement tools (like AI-powered comment detection), as well other social media-specific tools. CoSchedule’s email subject line tester, headline generator, and writing assistant make it more suitable for blogs and email marketing.
- Analytics: Both CoSchedule and Buffer offer powerful analytics tools, but the best choice depends on what you need. If tracking how well your team works together is important, CoSchedule might be the way to go. On the other hand, if you’re looking for detailed insights into your audience and how your posts are performing, Buffer could be a better fit.
- Ease of use: Both platforms are praised for their ease of use.
- Pricing: Buffer’s paid plans are more affordable.
Pricing
All pricing options are calculated based on the pricing of the annual subscription.
$19/month for:
- 1 user (up to 3 users at $19/user each)
- unlimited social media publishing
- bulk scheduling
- best time to publish suggestions
- AI image generation
$25/month ($5 per social media account) for:
- 1 user
- unlimited scheduled posts per channel
- scheduling posts on predefined time slots
- save draft posts
- calendar view
- reporting
- approval workflows restricted to more expensive plans
$19/month for:
- 1 user (up to 3 users at $19/user each)
- unlimited social media publishing
- bulk scheduling
- best time to publish suggestions
- AI image generation
$25/month ($5 per social media account):
- 1 user
- unlimited scheduled posts per channel
- scheduling posts on predefined time slots
- save draft posts
- calendar view
- reporting
- approval workflows restricted to more expensive plans
Takeaway: CoSchedule is one of the best Buffer alternatives for those who focus on a broader content marketing strategy that goes beyond social media posts. For instance, the platform is also suitable for planning and creating blogs, then promoting them across multiple channels, like social media and emails.
Buffer alternative #7: Zoho Social. An alternative for analytics.
Zoho Social is a social media management solution catered towards solopreneurs and small businesses. The platform allows you to collaborate on and schedule posts, monitor and respond to comments from multiple platforms, and gather in-depth analytics — Zoho’s main strength.
Zoho allows marketers to track social media performance across multiple platforms. It reveals information specific to each channel, like review trends for Google Business Profile listings or your LinkedIn followers’ job titles, seniority levels, or industries.
Drawbacks: For the video content, Zoho Social focuses on automatic optimization to meet platform requirements and does not offer manual editing tools.
Supported platforms: Facebook, Twitter (X), LinkedIn, Instagram, Pinterest, TikTok, YouTube, Google Business Profile, and Mastodon.
Pricing: There’s a free version available for one user and 7 social channels. Paid plans start at $10/month (annually).
Zoho Social vs Buffer
- Features: Both Zoho Social and Buffer offer strong collaboration and post customization features. Zoho Social stands out with its Collaborate tab for team discussions and in-app image editing. Meanwhile, Buffer excels in advanced post customization, letting users tailor content for each platform to boost engagement.
- Analytics: Zoho Social offers detailed analytics for YouTube, TikTok, Pinterest, and major platforms like Facebook and Instagram, making it ideal for video and visual content. Buffer covers a broader range, including Threads, Bluesky, and YouTube Shorts, with deeper insights into post performance and audience engagement.
- Ease of use: Both tools share similar scores in terms of ease of use.
- Pricing: Zoho’s paid plans are more expensive. However, the paid entry-level package includes up to nine channels.
Pricing
All pricing options are calculated based on the pricing of the annual subscription.
$10.80/month for:
-
- 1 user
- 1 brand
- bulk scheduling
- video optimization
- 15 day channel summary report
- no post analytics on Standard plan
- no collaboration features on Standard plan
*price converted from 10 EUR
$50/month ($5 per social media account) for:
- 1 user
- unlimited scheduled posts per channel
- scheduling posts on predefined time slots
- channel & post analytics
- calendar view
- save draft posts
- approval workflows restricted to more expensive plans
$10.80/month for:
-
- 1 user
- 1 brand
- bulk scheduling
- video optimization
- 15 day channel summary report
- no post analytics on Standard plan
- no collaboration features on Standard plan
*price converted from 10 EUR
$50/month ($5 per social media account):
- 1 user
- unlimited scheduled posts per channel
- scheduling posts on predefined time slots
- channel & post analytics
- calendar view
- save draft posts
- approval workflows restricted to more expensive plans
Takeaway: Given its versatile reports and in-depth platform-specific analytics, Zoho is among the top alternatives to Buffer for small agencies seeking to keep a close eye on their social media campaigns.
Buffer alternative #8: Loomly. An alternative social media content creation.
Loomly is a social media management tool that allows small and mid-sized agencies to boost their social media efforts through the platform’s audience targeting tools (available for Facebook and LinkedIn), approval workflows, automated publishing, and more.
Loomly is among the top Buffer alternatives for content creation and social media scheduling. The software’s entry-level plan, now priced at $32/month (billed annually), allows for up to 10 social media accounts and two users. Loomly also includes post mockups, and automatic post optimization tips — features that Buffer does not offer.
Drawbacks: Users report that creating and scheduling social media posts can be slightly cumbersome — you can’t drag and drop photos or videos into a post. Post creation is divided into a step-by-step process.
Supported platforms: Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, X (formerly Twitter), YouTube, LinkedIn, Pinterest, Google Business Profile, Snapchat, Threads.
Pricing: Loomly starts at $32/month (annually, for 2 users & 10 social media accounts). There’s a 15-day free trial available.
Loomly vs Buffer
- Features: Loomly includes more collaboration and post creation functionalities (comments, mockups, content libraries). However, Buffer includes AI-powered comment detection and integrates with Canva.
- Analytics: Both Buffer and Loomly offer customizable reports and audience demographic insights. However, Loomly provides the added convenience of automated report scheduling, allowing users to keep stakeholders updated without manual intervention.
- Ease of use: Both share a roughly similar score on G2, with Loomly winning by a small margin.
- Pricing: Loomly is more expensive and doesn’t offer a free version. However, considering that the entry-level plan is available for up to two users and ten social profiles, Loomly may bring better value for money.
Pricing
All pricing options are calculated based on the pricing of the annual subscription.
$32/month for:
- 2 users
- unlimited scheduling
- reply to interactions on Instagram, Facebook, X, and LinkedIn
- unlimited media storage
- approval workflows
$50/month ($5 per social media account) for:
- 1 user
- unlimited scheduled posts per channel
- scheduling posts on predefined time slots
- custom reports
- calendar view
- save draft posts
- post analytics
$32/month for:
- 2 users
- unlimited scheduling
- reply to interactions on Instagram, Facebook, X, and LinkedIn
- unlimited media storage
- approval workflows
$50/month ($5 per social media account):
- 1 user
- unlimited scheduled posts per channel
- scheduling posts on predefined time slots
- custom reports
- calendar view
- save draft posts
- post analytics
Takeaway: Due to its large selection of supported networks and post creation functionalities, Loomly is among the top Buffer alternatives for small and mid-sized businesses seeking to enhance brand awareness through content.
Buffer alternative #9: Later. An alternative for Instagram and TikTok.
Later is an easy-to-use social media tool that handles planning, scheduling, content creation, and more.
Although this tool supports various major social media platforms, most of its functionalities focus on Instagram and TikTok — you can analyze Instagram Stories performance, get insights on TikTok demographics, and manage Linkin.bio pages across both platforms.
Drawbacks: While Later supports multiple platforms, its features are heavily optimized for Instagram and TikTok. For instance, the social inbox functionality is exclusive to these two platforms, limiting engagement capabilities for other networks.
Supported platforms: Instagram, Facebook, Twitter (X), Pinterest, Threads, TikTok, LinkedIn, YouTube, Snapchat.
Pricing: Later’s Starter plan is available at $16.67/month (billed annually) for one user and one social set, with a 14-day free trial.
Later vs Buffer
- Features: While Later excels in UGC management and provides platform-specific tools for Instagram and TikTok, Buffer offers broader AI-powered assistance across multiple channels.
- Analytics: Buffer offers customizable reports, including LinkedIn analytics and boosted post insights for Facebook and Instagram. Later excels in TikTok analytics, providing detailed performance tracking for the platform.
- Ease of use: Both platforms share the same score in terms of setup and ease of use.
- Pricing: Buffer is more affordable and includes a free version, unlike Later.
Pricing
All pricing options are calculated based on the pricing of the annual subscription.
$16.67/month for:
- 1 user
- 1 social profile for each of the 7 supported platforms
- 30 posts per social profile
- 5 AI credits
- Limited analytics (3 months of data)
- 5 tags
$35/month ($5 per social media account) for:
- 1 user
- unlimited scheduled posts per channel
- scheduling posts on predefined time slots
- save draft posts
- channel & post analytics
- 250 tags
- calendar view
- link in bio landing page
- approval workflows restricted to more expensive plans
$16.67/month for:
- 1 user
- 1 social profile for each of the 7 supported platforms
- 30 posts per social profile
- 5 AI credits
- Limited analytics (3 months of data)
- 5 tags
$35/month ($5 per social media account):
- 1 user
- unlimited scheduled posts per channel
- scheduling posts on predefined time slots
- save draft posts
- channel & post analytics
- 250 tags
- calendar view
- link in bio landing page
- approval workflows restricted to more expensive plans
Takeaway: Later is one of the best Buffer alternatives for agencies focusing their social media marketing campaigns on TikTok and Instagram.
Buffer alternative #10: Sked Social. An alternative for user-generated content.
Sked Social is an Instagram-first social media management platform for teams and agencies with a focus on visual and user-generated content. It helps users plan, create, curate, publish, and analyze their social media posts.
I like that each plan allows unlimited team members, but the limited number of social accounts you get feels restrictive. If you need additional social profiles, each one costs extra. This can add up pretty quickly.
Drawbacks: Pricing tiers make Sked Social unsuitable for smaller teams on tighter budgets. Some users have historically reported technical issues with posts that include tags.
Supported platforms: Instagram, Facebook, X, LinkedIn, YouTube, TikTok, Pinterest, Google Business Profile, Snapchat.
Pricing: Sked Social starts at $59/month for the Essentials plan (when billed annually) and there’s a 7-day free trial available.
Sked Social vs Buffer
- Features: Sked Social’s media library is a neat feature that combines with a Google Chrome plugin. You can use this to save images from around the web which then become available to use in your posts on the Sked platform. There’s also a hashtag search function to identify user-generated content. Buffer allows you to save content ideas with images and videos, but doesn’t have a media library for reusable assets.
- Analytics: Both platforms offer analytics for major social media channels. Sked Social provides advanced features like competitor analysis and custom period comparisons, but these are limited to higher-tier plans. Buffer offers comprehensive analytics, including customizable reports and audience demographic insights, across all paid plans.
- Ease of use: Both share a similar score on G2 for ease of us, but Buffer wins more clearly when it comes to ease of setup.
- Pricing: Buffer’s pricing structure is more flexible and affordable for individuals or small teams with fewer social media accounts, while Sked Social’s plans are designed to accommodate larger teams needing collaborative tools, offering unlimited user access at a higher base price.
Pricing
All pricing options are calculated based on the pricing of the annual subscription.
$59/month* for:
- unlimited users
- add extra accounts for $10/month each
- unlimited post scheduling
- media library
- repurpose UGC
$15/month ($5 per social media account) for:
- 1 user
- unlimited scheduled posts per channel
- scheduling posts on predefined time slots
- calendar view
- draft posts
- link in bio landing page
- reporting
- approval workflows restricted to more expensive plans
$59/month* for:
- unlimited users
- add extra accounts for $10/month each
- unlimited post scheduling
- media library
- repurpose UGC
$15/month ($5 per social media account):
- 1 user
- unlimited scheduled posts per channel
- scheduling posts on predefined time slots
- calendar view
- draft posts
- link in bio landing page
- reporting
- approval workflows restricted to more expensive plans
Takeaway: Marketing teams and agencies who prioritize Instagram as a channel, and work primarily on visual content, will most likely find Sked Social to be an upgrade on what Buffer has to offer. Smaller teams and solo creators will find the pricing too steep.
Buffer alternative #11: SocialPilot. An alternative for established agencies.
SocialPilot is a solid social media management platform with dedicated agency client management features. For example, the dashboard makes it easy to add new clients and manage existing clients. Custom roles and permissions can be set up for each stakeholder and you’re able to build separate internal and external approval workflows. However, these agency-centered features are only available on certain plans.
On the basic level, the Professional plan gets you social media publishing features, such as a calendar view, post scheduling, and an AI assistant. But you don’t get any collaboration features included and the analytics package is limited.
Drawbacks: SocialPilot’s collaboration tools, more advanced analytics, and agency-specific features are only available on more expensive plans.
Supported platforms: Instagram, Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), LinkedIn, TikTok, YouTube, Pinterest, Google Business Profile, and Threads.
Pricing: SocialPilot starts at $42.50/month for the Standard plan (billed yearly) and there’s a 14-day free trial available for all pricing plans.
SocialPilot vs Buffer
- Features: While SocialPilot offers bulk scheduling and a social inbox, it lacks a hashtag manager. Buffer provides a hashtag manager but does not support bulk scheduling.
- Analytics: Both platforms provide analytics for Instagram, Facebook, X, and LinkedIn. Buffer lacks Google Business Profile reports, while SocialPilot lacks TikTok insights.
- Ease of use: Both share a roughly similar score on G2, with SocialPilot winning by a small margin.
- Pricing: Buffer is more affordable for those who only need a few channels covered. Once you’re managing more than five social accounts, SocialPilot starts to become better value for money.
Pricing
All pricing options are calculated based on the pricing of the annual subscription.
$42.50/month for:
- 3 users
- no bulk scheduling
- schedule 10 posts from RSS feeds
- team collaboration features
- limited analytics
$75/month ($5 per social media account) for:
- 1 user
- unlimited scheduled posts per channel
- scheduling posts on predefined time slots
- hashtag manager
- calendar view
- draft posts
- channel & post analytics
- approval workflows restricted to more expensive plans
$42.50/month for:
- 3 users
- no bulk scheduling
- schedule 10 posts from RSS feeds
- team collaboration features
- limited analytics
$50/month ($5 per social media account):
- 1 user
- unlimited scheduled posts per channel
- scheduling posts on predefined time slots
- hashtag manager
- calendar view
- draft posts
- channel & post analytics
- approval workflows restricted to more expensive plans
Takeaway: SocialPilot is a good alternative to Buffer for marketing teams and established social media agencies. The most valuable features are restricted to more expensive plans, which may make the platform less appealing to solo creators or smaller teams on a tight budget.
FAQs about Buffer
Which one is better Buffer or Hootsuite?
It depends. Buffer is a solid choice for freelancers and small business owners — it offers a free version, while paid plans are rather affordable and cover all the key features (campaign analysis, post scheduling, post optimization).
In contrast, Hootsuite’s functionalities are more advanced (includes paid social advertising, bulk scheduling) and cover in-depth team management capabilities — perfect for large organizations.
Is Buffer really free?
Yes. Buffer offers a free version available to one user and three social media profiles. However, the free plan is rather limited in features. Planable’s free version gives you access to all of the platform’s features (except Twitter publishing) and allows you to schedule up to 50 total posts.
Is Buffer a good platform?
Yes, it’s a solid entry-level platform. Its main issue is that although it offers many functionalities, they are relatively shallow. For instance, you can invite team members to your workspace, but the platform lacks the option to leave comments next to each draft. For that, consider other Buffer alternatives like Planable.